联系我们
我们只做按需定制化代写服务,绝对原创!
QQ:41806229 点击这里在线咨询代写
Email:admin@assignment.cc
网  址:http://www.assignment.cc/
支持Paypal、VISA、MasterCard、Discover等银行卡支付
Paypal支付
Human Resource Practice
发表日期:2013-08-26 08:51:44 | 来源:assignment.cc | 当前的位置:首页 > 写作FAQ > 正文
Human Resource Practice
ASSIGNMENT 
 
Format and Links Between the Marking Criteria and Content
Format 
The layout is likely to be different than in HRP1, in that the assignment does not naturally accommodate a separate literature section.  There is no prescribed format, but the following outline provides one suggestion:
Introduction
Very low marks are allocated to this area, hence the introduction should be very brief, just outlining the direction.
Main Discussion
This part could be divided into sub-sections that address the competencies and then the exercises, or the competencies and exercise could be discussed together. In this discussion part you would need to address the following:
• justify the competencies in terms of the job/role and culture of the host country•
• justify the exercise chosen to test the competencies, with reference to assessment centre methodology and culture•
(you do not have to design each exercise in detail, although in your justification of the exercises you will need to give an outline of what is being proposed)
• use literature to justify the competencies and cultural elements•
• throughout, relate the discussion to the literature on assessment centre methodology•
• explain why some approaches were chosen and others rejected  •
Conclusion
Draw together the essay and summarise the key points – quite brief
Bibliography
Must be in Harvard-style, with the detail being listed correctly and with author’s placed in alphabetical order by their family name. 
Appendices
Appendices are not included in the word count. May include a matrix of the competencies and exercises, or additional detail of these and the culture.
 
Marking Criteria
 
The assessed work for Human Resource Practice 2 will be marked in accordance with the following IDPM dimensions:
 
1.  Research and use of resources (approx. 3.5/10 importance)
“This refers to the level of research effort and degree of scholarship, with a particular emphasis on obtaining evidence from authoritative sources. Efforts should be made to interrogate the sources used, particularly in relation to other sources, rather than simply reproducing what others have said.”
 
Primary Source
 
Predominately refers to the literature used in the assignment, to justify the points being made. Need to demonstrate synthesis and critical analysis using the literature to explain alternative viewpoints. Specifically, the literature used is likely to address the areas of competencies, the specific job chosen, organisational and national culture and the assessment centre methodology, including the exercises.
2.  Analysis and argument (approx. 4.5/10 importance)
“The work should be focused on answering the specific question set and should be analytical in its approach (not just describing the topic under consideration).  The work should draw on relevant theory, concepts and models as discussed in the literature. It should demonstrate a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of this material and of its value in enhancing understanding of the issues under consideration.  A coherent and purposeful line of argument should be followed throughout, and should be supported by evidence in the form of relevant examples, research findings and other material to provide convincing support for what is being argued.”
 
Primary Source
Primarily refers to the analysis undertaken in the assignment – need to apply concepts and critically evaluate their fit with the situation.  Literature is used to ‘make sense’ of the situation and support the issues being presented.  Specifically, the analysis will relate to why the competencies have been selected, along with the justification of the assessment centre exercises, both in relation to the competencies and the culture. The key word is ‘justification’ – that is, ideas are supported by the literature and the reasons for choices are explained.
3.  Linking theory and practice (approx. 1/10 importance)
“Where applicable, the work should demonstrate the ability to make relevant connections between theory and practice (e.g. with regards the political, strategic, policy or management implications of your response).”
 
Primary Source
The whole assignment contains elements of linking theory and practice.  However, this area will predominately refer to the conclusions which have been drawn from the analysis – need to draw together the key points in a rational and objective way. 
4.  Structure, Style, and Presentation (approx. 1/10 importance)
“The work should read in a clear and logical manner from start to finish. It should be proof-read and corrected to avoid typographical and grammatical errors. The introduction should set out the structure and content of the essay and the direction and conclusion of the argument to be pursued. All sources used should be properly referenced using the Harvard system. This means citing authors, dates of publication and (where appropriate) page numbers in the text and providing full references at the end of the work. Footnotes should be avoided unless absolutely necessary. All work must be paginated and double-spaced in minimum 12 font. The word count includes tables, figures and footnotes but not the bibliography or the title page.”
Primary Source
Predominately refers to writing style, grammar and spelling, along with accurate and consistent referencing.  The general layout and presentation, along with being within the word-count of 3,000 words, are included in this area, as is the presentation of a full Harvard-style bibliography. Finally, the introduction, which needs to provide a brief overview of the purpose of the assignment, is included.

 
人力资源管理实践
作业
扣分标准和内容之间的格式和链接
格式
布局是可能比HRP1的不同在于,分配不自然容纳一个单独的文献部分。有没有规定的格式,但下面的轮廓提供了一个建议:
介绍
非常低的商标被分配到该区域,因此引进应该是非常简短,只是概述了方向。
主要讨论
这部分可以分成小节,解决的能力,然后练习的能力和锻炼可以一起讨论。在这个讨论中的一部分,你需要解决以下几个:
·证明工作/东道国的作用和文化方面的能力
•辩解行使选择测试能力,参考评估中心方法和文化•
(你不设计每个细节行使,虽然你的理由的练习,你需要给一个轮廓是,建议)
••用文献来证明能力和文化元素
••贯穿始终,涉及文学上评价中心方法的讨论
•解释为什么一些方法选择和拒绝别人•
结论
汇集论文和总结的关键点 - 相当简短
参考书目
必须在哈佛式的细节被正确列出作者的放在自己的姓的字母顺序。
附录
附录中未包含的字数。可能包括矩阵的能力和练习,这些额外的细节和文化。
 
评分标准
 
评估工作的人力资源实践2将被标记在按照以下IDPM尺寸:
 
1。研究和使用的资源(约3.5/10重要性的)
“这是指研究工作的水平和奖学金程度,特别强调从权威渠道获得的证据。应作出努力,来询问的来源,特别是在有关其他来源,而不是简单复制别人怎么说。“
 
主要来源
 
为主是指在分配中使用的文献,证明所提出的论点。需要证明的合成和利用文献来解释不同的观点的批判性分析。具体来说,文学领域的能力,很可能选择的具体工作,组织和国家的文化和评估中心的方法,包括练习。
2。分析和论证(约4.5/10重要性)
“这项工作应侧重于回答的具体问题,应该是分析其做法(不只是描述正在审议的议题)。有关工作应借鉴相关理论,概念和模型,在文献中讨论。它应该表现出一个清楚的了解这种材料,它的价值在加深了解所审议的问题的强项和弱项。一个连贯的和有针对性的论点应遵循整个相关的例子,研究结果和其他材料提供令人信服的支持正在争论什么形式的证据,应予以支持。“
 
主要来源
主要是指在分配进行分析 - 需要申请的概念和批判性地评价自己适合的情况。文学是用来'有意义'的情况,并支持所提出的问题。具体来说,分析会涉及到已选定的能力为何,随着评估中心练习的理由,无论是在能力和文化有关。关键的词是“理由” - 这就是说,思想文献的支持,并解释选择的原因。
3。理论和实际联系(约1/10的重要性)
“在适用的情况下,应该表现出的工作能力,使有关理论与实践之间的连接(例如,关于政治,战略,政策或管理的影响,你的回应)。”
 
主要来源
整个转让包含的元素,把理论和实践联系起来。然而,在这方面会为主指已分析得出的结论 - 需要在理性和客观的方式汇集的关键点。
4。结构,样式,和演示(约1/10的重要性)
“这项工作应该阅读清晰而有逻辑的方式,从开始到结束。应当证明读取和纠正,以避免印刷和语法错误。引进应载的一篇文章的结构和内容的说法要追求的方向和结论。采用哈佛系统应正确引用来源。这意味着引用作者,出版日期及(如适用)在文本页码,并提供完整的参考工作结束。除非绝对必要,否则应避免脚注。所有工作必须在分页和双倍行距最低12字体。字数包括表格,图形和脚注,但没有参考书目或扉页。“
主要来源
为主是指写作风格,语法和拼写,准确和一致的参考。的总体布局和介绍,随着3000字内的单词数,在这方面,是一个完整的哈佛式书目的介绍。最后,引进,这就需要提供一个简要的概述分配的目的,是包括在内。