联系我们
我们只做按需定制化代写服务,绝对原创!
QQ:41806229 点击这里在线咨询代写
Email:admin@assignment.cc
网  址:http://www.assignment.cc/
支持Paypal、VISA、MasterCard、Discover等银行卡支付
Paypal支付
代写美国assignment,War President Issues
发表日期:2013-09-30 08:56:52 | 来源:assignment.cc | 当前的位置:首页 > 代写assignment > 美国assignment代写 > 正文
War President Issues
On January 20, 2005, President George W. Bush was inaugurated into the White House for his second consecutive presidential term. Although popular support behind the War on Terror was beginning to fade, the incumbent President managed reelection by emphasizing the patriotism America had encountered since 9/11/01. However, three years later, in 2008, America has found itself wrapped up in a seemingly endless war, an economy on the verge of recession, and a divided government – both Congress and President Bush unwilling to compromise on several issues. Additionally, Americans must concern themselves with the selection of the 44thPresident of the United States, deciding between Senator John McCain (R), Senator Barack Obama (D), or Senator Hillary Clinton (D), for the one that can and will act quickly on these issues without being engulfed in the overwhelming new status quo of the Presidency.
The newly elected President in 2008 will face numerous challenges in their first term through 2012. They must ask themselves not only how to fix the current issues at hand, but also how to prevent potentially destructive problems on the horizon. Regardless, the 44th President of the United States should be most concerned with the energy crisis. According to former Congressman Lou Frey (R), we are currently importing 60% of our oil, and we have no national energy policy to deal with out-of-control prices. Also, the new President must learn to be financially responsible through fiscal policy and understanding fundamental economic policy, including the budget deficit and social programs. The fact that our economy is on the verge of a recession and our country is at war reflects poor policy-making on the part of the government. Therefore, to get the economic house in order, the U.S. must keep foreign countries and itself fiscally responsible. However, this seems like an impossibility when our government considers “progress” as spending close to $12 Billion a month in Iraq. Of course, the War on Terror and national security also need to be priorities for the 44th President. Foreign policy will not get marginalized in the general election. The real issue is that terrorism cannot be defeated because it’s a tactic, and as we dig ourselves deeper in the war, we become entrenched in the hostilities and inactions between other countries, which can be seen with the “new” threat of Iran.
My personal belief is that the energy issue incorporates all of the other issues into itself. For example, the War on Terror is fought in the Middle East, where the majority of our imported oil comes from. This leads to economic peril in the United States as we have seen over the past few years, which ultimately causes global economic stress, as the United States is a leading trade partner for numerous foreign countries. All factors considered, our domestic economic policy is ultimately controlled by countries such as Saudi Arabia, so if the Republicans plan on winning the general election in November of 2008, they have a lot to overcome. With current average gasoline prices across the United States sitting at just under $4.00 per gallon, up nearly $1.00 since 2007, some national energy policy must be enacted, whether that includes drilling in Alaska, or seeking alternative forms of power, including cutting-edge solar and nuclear power. Americans simply have a need for energy – petroleum, natural gas, electricity – it’s how America seems to function in the new technological age.
Obviously, a new national policy must be developed before prices continue to skyrocket. The source of our new energy should be derived from nuclear power. We are a country with top performing scientists that are well-equipped for research. The technology is already out there, it is a matter of making this technology affordable for the average citizen. The next president, republican or democrat, must jumpstart a nuclear program in all states with at least some allocated federal funds. We cannot simply pull out of the War to maintain this money, however, because the War on Terrorism is very much like Vietnam, with the exception that people actually care for the troops. America is stuck in a war of which it must gradually fade out. Instead, investment and exploration funded through taxes should be strongly encouraged again by the federal and state governments to boost the economy, and allow liquid cash-flow to fund the researching. The fact remains that nuclear energy has proven to be environmentally friendly. Of course, nuclear power plants don’t simply appear, and it will take a lot of time, money, and resources to convert to a nuclear-based energy system. However, the reduced consumption of oil will allow us to import less and become economically and therefore, politically independent. The ultimate goal is having the market become stabilized, and eventually, moving away from oil completely.
So who will do the best at holding our country together? I think John McCain will be the 44thPresident of the United States. Contrary to popular belief, the United States is not in a recession yet, which is defined as two consecutive quarters of declining GDP – in effect, six months. The race thus far has appeared to be the democrats’ race to lose. However, the Democratic Party has been torn apart by the prolonged Obama/Clinton race in the primaries. John McCain has appeared as a “solutionist” according to Mr. Lewis Oliver, since the extremely polarized parties on either end will hate him, but he picks up a majority of the moderate vote. Also, Hillary supporters will not want to vote for Obama in the general election. Obama is campaigning with a series of slogans that television has bought into, not necessarily how you lead the country. Although John McCain is in danger of being a one-term president, he has suggested the priorities of his Presidency to include controversial items such as social security, immigration, and a national energy policy – which can almost guarantee he would not get reelected in 2012. As crazy as it may sound, I think McCain should choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate to pull through and win the race in November. The country wants change, and John McCain being a moderate, would be willing to work with our democratic Congress, while Hillary would represent commonality. Hillary Clinton already has experience in the White House, and America isn’t used to not having an incumbent running for office. Obama will definitely pick up the youth vote, but I believe there is still a silent majority that will appear in November coming in strong for McCain. No doubt, heated debate on hot-button issues is unavoidable, but our government needs to represent all sides, not to quietly go about their business without regards to the general public. Also, with a McCain/Clinton ticket, the country wouldn’t rush out of the war, causing even more global economic stress, but instead we could start a new calendar, setting a new agenda for an administration to work its hardest to get our troops out of Iraq, as quickly and safely as possible. John McCain stated in a press conference last month that he has a plan to get the troops out safely by 2013. With an increasing number of independents, candidates can’t just strike for party loyalty and exploit their base party for votes, so a Hillary Clinton running mate would definitely attract a lot of the democratic votes. The only problem may be getting extreme party loyalists to vote, but in the end it’s either John McCain or Barack Obama. As for the age issue, you can’t fix your birth certificate; therefore, McCain shouldn’t be stereotyped on his age just as Obama is not stereotyped by his race.
The 2008 election is going to be a politically exciting one. One of the largest youth turnouts is expected in the 2008 election, indicating a higher interest level among college students. Obama may be relying on this appeal for some of his votes, but regardless, he will be a tough candidate to defeat. Nonetheless, I think a lot of government-public interaction is going to have to occur for a President to have high approval ratings. On January 20, 2009, when McCain, Obama, or even Clinton accepts their Presidency, and offers their bold solutions to current domestic issues, they must be relentless with their decisions and choose the right cabinet to represent America properly. With the “dawning of a new administration, [and] the nation fac[ing] perils within and without,” the 44th President of the United States must definitely have a national energy policy and focus on funding important issues through fiscal policy.
Bibliography
Conte, Christopher, and Albert R. Karr. "Foreign Trade and Global Economic Policies."
Outline of the U.S. Economy. Ed. George Clack. Feb. 2001. U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Information Programs. 29 May 2008. .
Frey, Louis. "The Frey Report." Lou Frey Institute of Politics & Government at the
University of Central Florida. 27 May 2008. Dept. of Political Science.
29 May 2008. .
The Lou Frey Institute Symposium 2007 – Presidential Elections: The Road to the White House 2008. Spon: The Lou Frey Institute of Politics and Government. Lecture:
David Broder. Fairwinds Alumni Center. University of Central Florida.
14 Nov. 2007.
The Lou Frey Institute Symposium 2008 - the Road to the White House: Tough Choices.
Spon: The Lou Frey Institute of Politics and Government. Lecture: SuChin Pak. University of Central Florida Student Union, Pegasus Ballroom. 31 Mar. 2008.
Schlesinger, Arthur M. The Imperial Presidency. First Mariner Books 2004 ed. New York: Mariner Books/Houghton Mifflin Company, 1973.
"U.S. Retail Gasoline Prices." Energy Information Administration. Dept. of Energy.
29 May 2008.
wrgp/mogas_home_page.html>.
Wilson, James Q., and John J. Dilulio. American Government: Institutions and Policies. 9th ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003.
 
2005年1月20日,美国总统乔治·W·布什进入白宫开始,他连续第二次总统任期。虽然火爆背后支持反恐战争的开始褪色,现任总统管理蝉联强调爱国主义美国遇到了自9/11/01 。然而,三年后,在2008年,美国已经发现自己包裹在一个看似无休止的战争,经济濒临衰退,以及一个分裂的政府 - 国会和布什总统都不愿意妥协的几个问题。此外,美国人必须关心与选择美国44thPresident ,参议员约翰·麦凯恩( R ) ,参议员奥巴马( D ) ,或参议员希拉里·克林顿( D )之间的决定,一个能够而且会迅速采取行动在这些问题上没有被淹没在铺天盖地的新总统现状。
新当选的总统在2008年将面临诸多挑战,在他们的第一任期到2012年。他们必须问自己,不仅是如何解决当前存在的问题手,但如何防止潜在的破坏性的问题在地平线上。无论如何,美国第44任总统应该是最关心的能源危机。据,前众议员娄弗雷( R ) ,我们目前60 %的石油进口,我们没有国家的能源政策,以应对控制价格。此外,新总统必须学会通过财政政策和了解基本的经济政策,包括财政赤字和社会方案在财政负责。事实上,我们的经济濒临衰退,我国是在战争中反映穷人的政策,对部分政府。因此,为了得到经济适用房时,美国必须保持国家和自身财政负责。然而,这似乎是不可能的,当我们的政府认为在伊拉克的花费接近120亿美元一个月的“进步” 。当然,还需要在反恐战争和国家安全,是第44任总统的重点。外交政策将不会在大选中被边缘化。真正的问题是,恐怖主义可以不被击败,因为它是一种战术,并为我们挖掘自己更深的战争中,我们成为根深蒂固的敌对行动和不作为其他国家,这可以被看到的“新”威胁伊朗之间。
我个人的信念是,能源问题结合到自身的所有其他问题。例如,在反恐战争的战斗中,我们进口石油的大部分来自中东。这将导致美国经济的危险,正如我们已经看到在过去的几年中,最终导致全球经济的压力,因为美国是一个领先的贸易伙伴为众多外国国家。考虑上述所有因素,我们的国内经济政策最终控制的国家,如沙特阿拉伯,因此,如果共和党人也计划在2008年11月赢得大选,他们有很多需要克服。随着目前的平均汽油价格在美国各地坐在刚刚下$ 4.00每加仑,涨近1.00美元自2007年以来,一些国家的能源政策必须制定,是否,包括钻井在阿拉斯加,或寻求另一种形式的权力,包括尖端太阳能和核能。美国人根本有需要的能源 - 石油,天然气,电力 - 这是美国如何在新的技术时代似乎功能。
显然,前必须制定新的国家政策,价格继续飞涨。我国新能源的来源应来自核电。我们是表现最出色的科学家,他们装备精良,用于研究的国家。该技术已经在那里,这是一个问题,使普通公民负担得起的技术。下一任总统,共和党或民主党,必须启动核计划的所有国家,至少有一些分配的联邦基金。我们不能简单地拉出的战争保持这个钱,但是,因为反恐战争非常像越南,与例外,人们真正关心的部队。美国陷在战争中,它必须逐渐淡出。相反,应该通过税收资助的投资和勘探强烈建议再次由联邦政府和各州政府,以提振经济,并允许液体的现金流,以资助研究。事实仍然是,核能已被证明是环保。当然,核电厂不只是出现,它会占用大量的时间,金钱和资源转换为基于核能源系统。然而,石油的消费量减少将使我们能够减少进口,并成为经济,因此,政治上的独立。最终的目标是成为稳定市场,并最终,远离油彻底。
那么,谁做的最好的在我们的国家团结起来?我认为约翰·麦凯恩将成为美国44thPresident 。流行的看法相反,美国是不是在经济衰退中,它被定义为连续两个季度GDP下降 - 实际上,半年。比赛迄今似乎是民主党的比赛失去。然而,民主党已经四分五裂长期奥巴马/希拉里在初选比赛。约翰·麦凯恩已经出现根据刘易斯·奥利弗先生作为一个“解决方案专家” ,因为极极化方的任一端会恨他,但,他拿起大多数适度表决。此外,希拉里的支持者不希望奥巴马在大选中投票。奥巴马竞选电视买了,不一定你如何带领国家一系列的口号。虽然约翰·麦凯恩是一个长期的总统的危险,他建议他的总统的优先事项,包括争议性的项目,如社会保障,移民和国家能源政策 - 这几乎可以保证他不会在2012年获得连任。由于疯狂的,因为它可能声音,我认为麦凯恩应该选择希拉里作为他的竞选伙伴渡过难关,并赢得比赛,在11月。该国愿意改变,和约翰·麦凯恩是一个温和的,愿意与我们的民主国会的工作,而希拉里将代表共性。希拉里·克林顿在白宫已经有了丰富的经验,和美国不使用不运行现任职务。奥巴马肯定会拿起年轻人的选票,但我相信仍然是沉默的大多数,将出现在11月到来强麦凯恩。毫无疑问,热点问题上的激烈争论是不可避免的,但我们的政府需要双方代表所有的,而不是悄悄地做他们的生意没有问候广大市民。此外,与一个麦凯恩/克林顿票的,该国将不会急于退出战争,甚至造成更多的全球经济压力,而是我们可以开始一个新的日历,设置一个新的议程管理工作最难得到的我们从伊拉克撤军,尽可能快速和安全。约翰·麦凯恩在上个月的新闻发布会上表示,他有一个计划,以获得安全部队2013年。随着越来越多的独立,考生可以不只是罢工对党的忠诚,并利用他们的基地党选票,所以希拉里·克林顿的竞选搭档,肯定会吸引了不少的民主票。唯一的问题可能会越来越极端党忠诚的人投票,但最终它是约翰·麦凯恩或奥巴马。至于年龄的问题,你不能修复你的出生证明书,因此,麦凯恩不应是千篇一律正如奥巴马在他的年龄不是他的种族刻板。
2008年大选将是一个政治激动人心的。其中一个最大的青年道岔预计在2008年的选举中,在大学生中显示出更高的利率水平。奥巴马可以依靠这项呼吁一些他的票,但无论如何,他将是一个艰难的候选人击败。尽管如此,我想了很多政府公共互动将不得不发生这样一位总统:有高支持率。 2009年1月20日,当麦凯恩,奥巴马,甚至克林顿接受他们的院长,他们大胆的解决方案,并提供目前国内问题,他们必须无情,他们的决定,并选择右边的机柜,正确代表美国。随着“黎明一个新的政府, [和]民族因素[和]内部和外部的危险, ”美国第44任总统必须绝对有一个国家的能源政策和资金的重要问题,通过财政政策的重点。
参考书目
康特,克里斯托弗和阿尔伯特·卡尔的。 “外贸和全球经济政策。 ”
美国经济纲要。埃德。乔治·克拉克。 2001年2月。美国国务院国际信息局。 2008年5月29日。 <http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/oecon/chap10.htm> 。
弗雷,路易。 “弗雷报告”。娄弗雷学院政治与政府
佛罗里达中央大学。 2008年5月27日。政治科学系。
2008年5月29日。 <http://loufrey.org/> 。
娄弗雷学院研讨会2007 - 总统选举: 2008年白宫之路。 SPON :娄弗雷研究所的政治和政府。讲座:
大卫·布罗德。费尔温兹校友中心。佛罗里达中央大学。
2007年11月14日。
娄弗雷学院研讨会2008 - 白宫之路的艰难抉择。
SPON :娄弗雷研究所的政治和政府。讲座: SuChin乐。中央佛罗里达大学的学生会,飞马舞厅。 2008年3月31日。
阿瑟·施莱辛格,帝国总统。第一水手图书2004版。纽约:水手书籍/霍顿米夫林公司,1973年。
“美国的汽油零售价格。 ”能源信息管理局。能源部。
2008年5月29日。 < http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/
[ wrgp / mogas_home_page.html 。
威尔逊,詹姆斯·Q ,约翰J. Dilulio 。美国政府机构和政策。第9版。纽约:霍顿米夫林公司, 2003年。
- R) ,参议员奥巴马(D) ,或参议员希拉里·克林顿(D
R) ,我们目前60
- 石油,天然气,电力 - 这是美国如何在新的技术时代似乎功能。
 
- - 
[和]民族因素[和]内部和外部的危险,
参考书目
康特,克里斯托弗和阿尔伯特·卡尔的“外贸和全球经济政策。 ”
美国经济纲要。埃德。乔治·克拉克2001年2月美国国务院国际信息局2008年5月29日。 <http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/oecon/chap10.htm> 。
弗雷,路易。 “弗雷报告” 。娄弗雷学院政治与政府
佛罗里达中央大学,2008年5月27日。政治科学系。
2008年5月29日。 <http://loufrey.org/> 。
娄弗雷学院研讨会2007 - 总统选举:2008年白宫之路。 SPON :娄弗雷研究所的政治和政府。讲座:
大卫·布罗德。费尔温兹校友中心。佛罗里达中央大学。
2007年11月14日。
娄弗雷学院研讨会2008 - 白宫之路的艰难抉择。
SPON :娄弗雷研究所的政治和政府。讲座: SuChin乐。中央佛罗里达大学的学生会,飞马舞厅,2008年3月31日。
 
“美国的汽油零售价格。 ”能源信息管理局。能源部。
2008年5月29日。 < http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/ ,
[ wrgp / mogas_home_page.html的。
威尔逊,詹姆斯· Q,约翰J. Dilulio美国政府机构和政策。第9版。纽约:霍顿米夫林公司, 2003年。